A Geographical Conceptual Framework: Space, Emotion, and Feeling

Authors

  • Naratorn Saiseng Faculty of Education, Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat University

Keywords:

Human Geography, Space, Emotion, Feeling

Abstract

This academic article emerged from the observation that situations, phenomena, and problems occurring in society all involve emotions. Emotions are therefore as significant as reason. This study asks whether understanding emotions in their social dimensions—differently from traditional scientific approaches—could expand the boundaries of knowledge. For this reason, the author, who has a strong interest in geography, presents concepts in human geography proposed by Doreen Massey, Nigel Thrift, and Yi-Fu Tuan as a framework for explaining emotions in social dimensions. This conceptual framework does not view emotions as arising in isolation; rather, it understands emotions as intricately connected with space through complex relational processes. The author synthesizes these conceptual frameworks and constructs an analytical model of emotions and feelings grounded in geographical thinking. This model is intended as a qualitative tool for analyzing human–space interactions in emotional and affective dimensions. This is divided into six stages: 1) Point of Transformation - the stage where spatial changes begin to stimulate emotions; 2) Emotional Genesis - the stage where emotions arise in response to spatial changes; 3) Shared Emotions - the stage where emotional reactions spread and shape the atmosphere of spaces; 4) Feeling Formation - the stage where emotions are interpreted and consolidated into feelings through spatial experience; 5) Interpretive Meaning-Making - the stage of producing meanings in the relationship between individuals and space; and 6) Cyclical Transformation - the stage where emotions and feelings shape perceptions and contribute to subsequent spatial changes. This article does not aim to provide definitive conclusions; rather, it aims to open new avenues for learning and to offer analytical lenses for understanding diverse and deeper social phenomena.

References

ชัยรัตน์ พลมุข. (2562). ทฤษฎีผัสสารมณ์ (Affect Theory) กับการศึกษาวรรณกรรม. ใน สุรเดช โชติ อุดมพันธ์ (บ.ก.), นววิถี: วิธีวิทยาร่วมสมัยในการศึกษาวรรณกรรม. สยามปริทัศน์.

อาทิตย์ เจียมรัตตัญญู. (2562). ผัสสศึกษาและผัสสวิจารณ์: พัฒนาการ แนวคิดทฤษฎี และวิธีวิทยา. ใน สุรเดช โชติอุดมพันธ์ (บ.ก.), นววิถี: วิธีวิทยาร่วมสมัยในการศึกษาวรรณกรรม, สยามปริทัศน์.

Anderson, K., & Smith, S. J. (2001). Editorial: Emotional Geographies. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26(1), 7–10.

Ahmed, S. (2014). The cultural politics of emotion (2nd ed.). Edinburgh University Press.

Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes' error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. G.P. Putnam.

Davidson, J., Bondi, L., & Smith, M. (2006). Emotional geographies. Routledge.

Massey, D. (1994). Space, Place, and Gender (NED-New edition). University of Minnesota Press.

Massey, D. (2005). For space. Sage.

Schachter, S., & Singer, J. E. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review. 69, 379-399.

Thrift, N. (2000). ‘Introduction: dead or alive?’, in I.Cook, D. Crouch, S. Naylor and J. Ryan (eds), Cultural Turns/Geographical Turns: Perspectives on Cultural Geography. Prentice-Hall.

Thrift, N. (2004). Intensities of Feeling: Towards a Spatial Politics of Affect. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography. 86(1), 57–78.

Tuan, Y. F. (1990). Topophilia: a study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. Columbia university press.

Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press

Downloads

Published

2026-01-29

How to Cite

Saiseng, N. . (2026). A Geographical Conceptual Framework: Space, Emotion, and Feeling. Journal of Arts and Cultural Perception, 25(1), 179–201. Retrieved from https://so18.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Art_and_Culture_BSRU/article/view/2537