A Geographical Conceptual Framework: Space, Emotion, and Feeling
Keywords:
Human Geography, Space, Emotion, FeelingAbstract
This academic article emerged from the observation that situations, phenomena, and problems occurring in society all involve emotions. Emotions are therefore as significant as reason. This study asks whether understanding emotions in their social dimensions—differently from traditional scientific approaches—could expand the boundaries of knowledge. For this reason, the author, who has a strong interest in geography, presents concepts in human geography proposed by Doreen Massey, Nigel Thrift, and Yi-Fu Tuan as a framework for explaining emotions in social dimensions. This conceptual framework does not view emotions as arising in isolation; rather, it understands emotions as intricately connected with space through complex relational processes. The author synthesizes these conceptual frameworks and constructs an analytical model of emotions and feelings grounded in geographical thinking. This model is intended as a qualitative tool for analyzing human–space interactions in emotional and affective dimensions. This is divided into six stages: 1) Point of Transformation - the stage where spatial changes begin to stimulate emotions; 2) Emotional Genesis - the stage where emotions arise in response to spatial changes; 3) Shared Emotions - the stage where emotional reactions spread and shape the atmosphere of spaces; 4) Feeling Formation - the stage where emotions are interpreted and consolidated into feelings through spatial experience; 5) Interpretive Meaning-Making - the stage of producing meanings in the relationship between individuals and space; and 6) Cyclical Transformation - the stage where emotions and feelings shape perceptions and contribute to subsequent spatial changes. This article does not aim to provide definitive conclusions; rather, it aims to open new avenues for learning and to offer analytical lenses for understanding diverse and deeper social phenomena.
References
ชัยรัตน์ พลมุข. (2562). ทฤษฎีผัสสารมณ์ (Affect Theory) กับการศึกษาวรรณกรรม. ใน สุรเดช โชติ อุดมพันธ์ (บ.ก.), นววิถี: วิธีวิทยาร่วมสมัยในการศึกษาวรรณกรรม. สยามปริทัศน์.
อาทิตย์ เจียมรัตตัญญู. (2562). ผัสสศึกษาและผัสสวิจารณ์: พัฒนาการ แนวคิดทฤษฎี และวิธีวิทยา. ใน สุรเดช โชติอุดมพันธ์ (บ.ก.), นววิถี: วิธีวิทยาร่วมสมัยในการศึกษาวรรณกรรม, สยามปริทัศน์.
Anderson, K., & Smith, S. J. (2001). Editorial: Emotional Geographies. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26(1), 7–10.
Ahmed, S. (2014). The cultural politics of emotion (2nd ed.). Edinburgh University Press.
Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes' error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. G.P. Putnam.
Davidson, J., Bondi, L., & Smith, M. (2006). Emotional geographies. Routledge.
Massey, D. (1994). Space, Place, and Gender (NED-New edition). University of Minnesota Press.
Massey, D. (2005). For space. Sage.
Schachter, S., & Singer, J. E. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review. 69, 379-399.
Thrift, N. (2000). ‘Introduction: dead or alive?’, in I.Cook, D. Crouch, S. Naylor and J. Ryan (eds), Cultural Turns/Geographical Turns: Perspectives on Cultural Geography. Prentice-Hall.
Thrift, N. (2004). Intensities of Feeling: Towards a Spatial Politics of Affect. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography. 86(1), 57–78.
Tuan, Y. F. (1990). Topophilia: a study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. Columbia university press.
Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles in this journal are copyrighted by the x may be read and used for academic purposes, such as teaching, research, or citation, with proper credit given to the author and the journal.use or modification of the articles is prohibited without permission.
statements expressed in the articles are solely the opinions of the authors.
authors are fully responsible for the content and accuracy of their articles.
other reuse or republication requires permission from the journal."