Dimensions of Social Capital and Their Impact on the Quality of Life of Caregivers for Dependent Older Persons: An Empirical Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69650/jcdrhs.2026.1880Keywords:
Structural Social Capital, Informal Caregivers, Quality of Life, Communal Resilience, Thai Aged Society, Dependent Older PersonsAbstract
As Northern Thailand transitions into a complete aged society with an aging rate exceeding 22%, the out-migration of the working-age population has created a critical care gap, leaving family caregivers to shoulder the burden of long-term care with diminishing kin support. This study employs Path Analysis within a Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) framework to evaluate the multidimensional influence of social capital on the Quality of Life (QoL) across physical, psychological, social, and environmental domains of 400 caregivers in this aging epicenter. The findings reveal that despite the challenges of aging-in-place, caregivers maintain high levels of social capital, which explains nearly half of the variance in their well-being (R2 = 0.463). Crucially, while cognitive elements of trust and reciprocity are foundational, social network support emerged as the most potent predictor of QoL (β = 0.730). This confirms that in high-dependency caregiving contexts, the tangible mobilization of community networks provides a more significant lifeline than psychological perceptions alone. The validated model serves as a regional blueprint, demonstrating that the hybridization of informal community bonds and the formal Village Health Volunteer (VHV) system effectively substitute for the missing middle generation. The study concludes that for aging-in-place to be sustainable, policy interventions must pivot from generic community-building toward structural network engineering. By prioritizing active, functional support networks, policymakers can ensure the resilience of caregivers who serve as the invisible infrastructure of long-term care in an increasingly aging world.
References
Adelman, R. D., Tmanova, L. L., Delgado, D., Dion, S., & Lachs, M. S. (2014). Caregiver burden: A clinical review. JAMA, 311(10), 1052-1060. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.304
Claridge, T. (2018). Functions of social capital–bonding, bridging, linking. Social Capital Research, V1, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7993853
Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (2013). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.
Department of Older Persons. (2023). Summary of Thailand’s elderly population (December 2022). Ministry of Social Development and Human Security. https://www.dop.go.th/th/know/side/1/1/1159
Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335–362. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.002003
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2018). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Jeerakamol, O. (2023). Social capital and quality of life of carer of the dependent elderly [Doctoral dissertation, Naresuan University]. Naresuan University Intellectual Repository. https://nuir.lib.nu.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/6297
Kemathad, C., Wijit, W., Praesi, S., Ampansirirat, A., Choopun, K., Sriyod, B., & Kunon, C. (2025). The secret of long living: A case study from Northern Thai elderly villagers. Journal of Nursing and Public Health Research, 5(3), e275105. https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jnphr/article/view/275105
Kim, K. A., Kim, Y.-E., & Yoon, S.-J. (2021). Descriptive epidemiology on the trends and sociodemographic risk factors of disease burden in years of life lost due to suicide in South Korea from 2000 to 2018. BMJ Open, 11(2), e043662. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043662
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.
Knodel, J., Teerawichitchainan, B., Prachuabmoh, V., & Pothisiri, W. (2015). The situation of Thailand’s older population: An update based on the 2014 survey of older persons in Thailand (Research report). Singapore Management University. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/1948
Lin, N. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28–51.
Nakonezny, P. A., & Denton, W. H. (2008). Marital relationships: A social exchange theory perspective. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 36(5), 402–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926180701647264
Nishino, K., Kotera, S., & Tongtham, A. (2021). Social capital and health-related quality of life of older adults living in Thai rural areas. Universal Journal of Public Health, 9(5), 306–316. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujph.2021.090513
Patulny, R. V., & Lind Haase Svendsen, G. (2007). Exploring the social capital grid: Bonding, bridging, qualitative, quantitative. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 27(1-2), 32–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330710722742
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
Uphoff, N. (2000). Understanding social capital: Learning from the analysis and experience of participation. In P. Dasgupta, & I. Serageldin (Eds.), Social capital: A multifaceted perspective (pp. 215–249). The World Bank.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Community Development Research (Humanities and Social Sciences)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




