Dimensions of Social Capital and Their Impact on the Quality of Life of Caregivers for Dependent Older Persons: An Empirical Analysis

Authors

  • Wanlapat Suksawas Faculty of Social Sciences, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand
  • Orn-uma Jeerakamol Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Lampang Rajabhat University, Lampang, Thailand
  • Parinya Soithong Faculty of Social Sciences, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand
  • Sunsai Wongsuwan Faculty of Political Science and Social Sciences, Phayao University, Phayao, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69650/jcdrhs.2026.1880

Keywords:

Structural Social Capital, Informal Caregivers, Quality of Life, Communal Resilience, Thai Aged Society, Dependent Older Persons

Abstract

As Northern Thailand transitions into a complete aged society with an aging rate exceeding 22%, the out-migration of the working-age population has created a critical care gap, leaving family caregivers to shoulder the burden of long-term care with diminishing kin support. This study employs Path Analysis within a Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) framework to evaluate the multidimensional influence of social capital on the Quality of Life (QoL) across physical, psychological, social, and environmental domains of 400 caregivers in this aging epicenter. The findings reveal that despite the challenges of aging-in-place, caregivers maintain high levels of social capital, which explains nearly half of the variance in their well-being (R2 = 0.463). Crucially, while cognitive elements of trust and reciprocity are foundational, social network support emerged as the most potent predictor of QoL (β = 0.730). This confirms that in high-dependency caregiving contexts, the tangible mobilization of community networks provides a more significant lifeline than psychological perceptions alone. The validated model serves as a regional blueprint, demonstrating that the hybridization of informal community bonds and the formal Village Health Volunteer (VHV) system effectively substitute for the missing middle generation. The study concludes that for aging-in-place to be sustainable, policy interventions must pivot from generic community-building toward structural network engineering. By prioritizing active, functional support networks, policymakers can ensure the resilience of caregivers who serve as the invisible infrastructure of long-term care in an increasingly aging world.

References

Adelman, R. D., Tmanova, L. L., Delgado, D., Dion, S., & Lachs, M. S. (2014). Caregiver burden: A clinical review. JAMA, 311(10), 1052-1060. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.304

Claridge, T. (2018). Functions of social capital–bonding, bridging, linking. Social Capital Research, V1, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7993853

Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (2013). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.

Department of Older Persons. (2023). Summary of Thailand’s elderly population (December 2022). Ministry of Social Development and Human Security. https://www.dop.go.th/th/know/side/1/1/1159

Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335–362. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.002003

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2018). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Jeerakamol, O. (2023). Social capital and quality of life of carer of the dependent elderly [Doctoral dissertation, Naresuan University]. Naresuan University Intellectual Repository. https://nuir.lib.nu.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/6297

Kemathad, C., Wijit, W., Praesi, S., Ampansirirat, A., Choopun, K., Sriyod, B., & Kunon, C. (2025). The secret of long living: A case study from Northern Thai elderly villagers. Journal of Nursing and Public Health Research, 5(3), e275105. https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jnphr/article/view/275105

Kim, K. A., Kim, Y.-E., & Yoon, S.-J. (2021). Descriptive epidemiology on the trends and sociodemographic risk factors of disease burden in years of life lost due to suicide in South Korea from 2000 to 2018. BMJ Open, 11(2), e043662. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043662

Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.

Knodel, J., Teerawichitchainan, B., Prachuabmoh, V., & Pothisiri, W. (2015). The situation of Thailand’s older population: An update based on the 2014 survey of older persons in Thailand (Research report). Singapore Management University. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/1948

Lin, N. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28–51.

Nakonezny, P. A., & Denton, W. H. (2008). Marital relationships: A social exchange theory perspective. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 36(5), 402–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926180701647264

Nishino, K., Kotera, S., & Tongtham, A. (2021). Social capital and health-related quality of life of older adults living in Thai rural areas. Universal Journal of Public Health, 9(5), 306–316. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujph.2021.090513

Patulny, R. V., & Lind Haase Svendsen, G. (2007). Exploring the social capital grid: Bonding, bridging, qualitative, quantitative. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 27(1-2), 32–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330710722742

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.

Uphoff, N. (2000). Understanding social capital: Learning from the analysis and experience of participation. In P. Dasgupta, & I. Serageldin (Eds.), Social capital: A multifaceted perspective (pp. 215–249). The World Bank.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-19

How to Cite

Suksawas, W., Jeerakamol, O.- uma, Soithong, P., & Wongsuwan, S. (2026). Dimensions of Social Capital and Their Impact on the Quality of Life of Caregivers for Dependent Older Persons: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Community Development Research (Humanities and Social Sciences), 19(2), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.69650/jcdrhs.2026.1880

Issue

Section

Research Articles