Curriculum Evaluation of the Bachelor of Arts Program in English (Revised Curriculum, B.E. 2565, Department of Foreign Languages, Faculty of Humanities, Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University

Abstract

This Article aimed to evaluate the English major curriculum, B.E. 2565 revision, Department of Foreign Languages, Faculty of Humanities, Mahaculalongkornrajvidyalaya University and study the ways to improve the curriculum. The sample group consists of 276 people who are  the educational experts, executives, lecturers and English major students, and ex-students’ employers or boss. This is a mixed-method research; quantitative and qualitative method. The quantitative research aims to evaluate the four factors: the context, input, process, and outcome. The research tool is an interrelated assessment that has the relationship with the context, and the evaluation form.

The result of research was found that the opinion of repondent towards the suitability of curriculum structure as overall at high level (μ = 3.66). If classifying according to respondents, it was found that the opinion of administrator, lecturer and student is at high level, the suitability of curriculum subjects as overall is at high level  (μ = 3.59). If classifying according to respondents, it was found that the opinion of administrator, lecturer and student is at high level, the suitability of lecturer characteristics as overall is at high level  (μ = 3.68). If classifying according to group of respondents, it was found that the opinion of administrator, lecturer and student is at high level, the suitability on the readiness of students as overall is at high level  (μ = 3.66). If classifying according to group of respondents, it was found that the opinion of administrator, lecturer and student is at high level, the opinion on readiness of students as overall is at high level  (μ = 3.84). If classifying according to group of respondents, it was found that the opinion of administrator, lecturer and student is at high level.