Submissions

Author Guidelines

INFORMATION FOR AUTHOR:

GUIDELINES FOR MANUSCRIPT PREPARATION DIFFERENT TYPES OF ARTICLES AND THEIR FORMATS THE MANUSCRIPTS THAT ARE SUBMITTED TO FOCUS ON ARTS: FAR, SSRU UNDERGO A RIGOROUS PROCESS OF CRITICAL EVALUATION PRIOR TO THEIR PUBLICATION. THE PRIMARY JOB OF THE REVIEWER IS TO ENGAGE IN A CRITICAL EVALUATION PROCESS TO ASSESS IF A PAPER ADHERES TO THE ESTABLISHED CRITERIA OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND LITERARY EXCELLENCE. IN ORDER FOR REVIEWS TO BE DEEMED VALID, THEY MUST BE GROUNDED IN MANUSCRIPTS THAT EXHIBIT A LEVEL OF LITERARY QUALITY THAT IS DEEMED SUFFICIENT. THE RESPONSIBILITY OF A REVIEWER DOES NOT ENCOMPASS THE TASK OF EDITING INADEQUATELY PREPARED PAPERS OR RECTIFYING EASILY IDENTIFIABLE FAULTS. TO MITIGATE POTENTIAL EMBARRASSMENT TO AUTHORS, MINIMIZE THE STRAIN ON REVIEWERS AND EDITORS, AND PREVENT UNNECESSARY EXPENDITURE OF TIME AND EFFORT, IT IS ADVISABLE FOR AUTHORS TO SUBJECT THEIR PAPERS TO A COMPREHENSIVE PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT BY COMPETENT PEERS PRIOR TO SUBMISSION TO THE JOURNAL.

PREPARATION OF MANUSCRIPTS:

IT IS A REQUIREMENT THAT ALL WRITTEN DOCUMENTS BE COMPOSED IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT MANUSCRIPTS ADHERE TO A MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 30 DOUBLE-SPACED A4 PAGES, UTILIZING A TYPEFACE SUCH AS TIMES NEW ROMAN OR A COMPARABLE OPTION, WITH A FONT SIZE OF 12 AND 1″ MARGINS. ADDITIONALLY, THE USE OF TABLES, FIGURES, OR PHOTOGRAPHS SHOULD BE LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF EIGHT. THE MANUSCRIPTS ARE TYPICALLY PRINTED IN MONOCHROME. IN THE EVENT OF ACCEPTANCE FOR PUBLICATION, IT IS REQUIRED THAT THE MANUSCRIPTS BE PROVIDED IN MS WORD FORMAT.

ACCEPTS PAPERS STRUCTURED:

SOCIAL SCIENCES: it is imperative for manuscripts to adhere to established conventions outlined in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. In order to adhere to the conventions of academic writing in the field of social science, it is essential for manuscripts to encompass four distinct sections, namely: Introduction, Methodology, Results, and Discussion. The inclusion of a conclusion is discretionary.

HUMANITIES: it is imperative to adhere to a specific framework when composing academic papers. The article is structured into four main components: Introduction, Context, Body, and Summary. The Introduction provides an overview of the research topic and its significance. The Context section provides relevant background information to situate the research within a broader academic context. The body of the paper is divided into several sections, each focusing on a specific point of discussion that is pertinent to the research. Finally, the Summary section provides a concise recapitulation of the main findings and conclusions of the paper.

SOCIAL SCIENCE MANUSCRIPTS:

1. TITLE

The author should strategically construct the title in order to provide sufficient information to enable potential readers to make an informed judgement regarding the possible relevance of the article.

2. AUTHOR (S)

Please provide the names of the authors, together with their entire postal addresses for their affiliations, and the email address of the corresponding author.

3. ABSTRACT AND KEYWORDS

The abstract should serve as a good literary supplement to the scientific report, catering to the requirements of both researchers and information specialists. The recommended maximum word count for the abstract is 250 words for full-length papers and 75 words for notes and brief pieces. The recommended practise is to include indexing keywords at the conclusion of the abstract.

4. INTRODUCTION

It is advisable to maintain concise introductions. Effective introductions should encompass many key elements. Firstly, it is crucial to provide a concise statement regarding the problem that serves as the rationale for undertaking the research or the hypothesis upon which it is grounded. Secondly, the introduction should acknowledge and address the existing findings of previous researchers that will be either challenged or expanded upon in the current study. Lastly, it is essential to elucidate the overall methodology and objectives of the research in order to provide a clear understanding of the study’s direction and purpose. The objective of the introduction should be to stimulate and engage the reader.

5. METHODOLOGY

This section provides comprehensive information pertaining to the materials used, procedures employed, experimental design implemented, and the environmental conditions in which the study was conducted. Adequate information should be included in order to enable the reader to replicate the experiments. The methods section can be organised in a chronological sequence, a succession of techniques, or other approaches that will best facilitate the reader’s understanding.

6. RESULTS

In order to enhance comprehension of the findings, it is recommended to employ visual aids such as tables, graphs, diagrams, and/or photographs. These visual representations will facilitate a lucid interpretation of the data. Extensive discussion of the data shown in graphics and tables is not necessary in the text; however, it is important to highlight noteworthy discoveries. Demonstrate the attainment of the stated objectives. The outcomes should be interconnected.

7. DISCUSSION

In the discussion section, the author evaluates the significance of the findings. Demonstrate how the obtained outcomes offer a resolution to the predicament outlined in the introductory section or specified as the target. This study aims to establish connections between its findings and prior research, elucidating both the similarities and discrepancies that exist. This study holds considerable significance and carries important implications within its respective field. It is crucial to recognise the potential future advances that may arise as a result of this research. It is imperative to refrain from providing justifications for unforeseen outcomes and experimental failures. It is imperative to engage in clear and equitable discussions regarding contentious matters. When there are discrepancies between current findings and prior research, it is imperative to provide a thorough explanation for these variations.

8. CONCLUSION (optional)

Many academic papers include a part dedicated to summarising the main findings and implications of the study, commonly referred to as the conclusion section. This encompasses all notable findings that have been derived from the conducted research. It is imperative to meticulously choose the wording of these statements in order to minimise any potential misinterpretation by the reader. In the context of scholarly discourse, it is frequently deemed advantageous to incorporate conclusions within the discussion portion. Nevertheless, in instances where a paper is extensive and intricate, it can be beneficial to provide a condensed overview of the findings in a distinct section.

9. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

All acknowledgments should be presented in written form and positioned prior to the references section.

10. REFERENCES

It is imperative that all in-text citations, footnotes/endnotes, and the reference page adhere to the criteria outlined in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA).

HUMANITIES MANUSCRIPTS:

The organization of the article should adhere to the aforementioned requirements for Social Science papers, with the exception that sections 5 – 7 need to be substituted as indicated below:

5. CONTEXT

The inclusion of diverse relationships, such as social, cultural, political, economic, historical, or ecological, within the topic of study is crucial for analyzing the research questions or concerns discussed in the main body of the article.

         POINTS OF DISCUSSION

The organization of the article should be based on essential topics of discourse, with the quantity of sections being flexible in accordance with the requirements of the research. Consequently, the body of the document will not have conventional headers, but rather headings that are suitable for the particular material being discussed.

         DISCUSSION 1:

Examining a research problem by considering the conceptualization of the field data within the given context.

         DISCUSSION 2:

This study aims to examine an additional research concern by analyzing the conceptualization of field data within a placed setting, while also establishing a connection to the first two difficulties previously discussed.

         DISCUSSION 3:

The present study aims to conduct an analysis of the most recent research problem, utilizing a conceptual framework to examine field data within a specific contextual setting. This analysis will also establish connections to the preceding two difficulties.

7. CONCLUSION

This study aims to identify significant research findings, accompanied by critical commentary and a comparative analysis with current literature.