กระบวนการเกมและจิตวิทยา: การศึกษาบรรณมิติ
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
แนวคิดของกระบวนการเกมมีบทบาทในการศึกษาและการประยุกต์ใช้ความรู้ทางจิตวิทยามากขึ้นเรื่อย ๆ
วัตถุประสงค์ของงานวิจัยนี้ คือ การใช้การศึกษาบรรณมิติ (Bibliometric method) เพื่อวิเคราะห์ข้อมูลบรรณมิติและ
ทำความเข้าใจองค์ความรู้เกี่ยวกับกระบวนการเกมและจิตวิทยาจากบทความทางวิชาการและบทความวิจัยต่าง ๆ
ที่ตีพิมพ์เผยแพร่อยู่ในฐานข้อมูล Scopus ผู้วิจัยใช้คำค้นหา “Gamification” และ “Psychology” ซึ่งนำไปสู่
บทความจำนวน 200 บทความ การวิเคราะห์สถิติพรรณนาพบว่า บทความที่ได้รับการอ้างอิงมากที่สุด คือ
“Foundations of game-based learning” ของ Plass et al. (2015) ผู้ประพันธ์ที่เผยแพร่บทความมากที่สุด คือ
Landers R. N. และผู้ประพันธ์ที่ได้รับการอ้างอิงมากที่สุด คือ Hamari J. ส่วนการวิเคราะห์เครือข่ายและการ
วิเคราะห์การจัดกลุ่มบทความ รายการอ้างอิง และคำสำคัญต่าง ๆ ทำให้ผู้วิจัยสามารถสังเคราะห์ธีม 4 ธีม (ซึ่งได้แก่
กระบวนการเกมและจิตวิทยาทางบวก กระบวนการเกมและจิตวิทยาสุขภาพ กระบวนการเกมและทฤษฎีการกำหนด
ตนเอง และกระบวนการเกมสำหรับการวัดและการประเมินทางจิตวิทยา) ที่สะท้อนโครงสร้างองค์ความรู้ที่เกิดขึ้นจาก
บทความทางวิชาการและบทความวิจัยเกี่ยวกับกระบวนการเกมและจิตวิทยา
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ผู้ส่งบทความ (และคณะผู้วิจัยทุกคน) ตระหนักและปฎิบัติตามจริยธรรมการวิจัยอย่างเคร่งครัด ทั้งนี้บทความ เนื้อหา ข้อมูล ข้อความ ภาพ ตาราง แผนภาพ แผนผัง หรือข้อคิดเห็นใดๆ ที่ปรากฎในบทความ เป็นความคิดเห็นและความรับผิดชอบของผู้ส่งบทความ กองบรรณาธิการไม่จำเป็นต้องเห็นตามเสมอไป และไม่มีส่วนรับผิดชอบใดๆ โดยถือเป็นความรับผิดของของเจ้าของบทความเพียงผู้เดียว
References
Allam, A., Kostova, Z., Nakamoto, K., & Schulz, P. (2015). The effect of social support features and gamification on a web-based intervention for rheumatoid arthritis patients: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17, e14. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3510
Anglada-Tort, M., & Sanfilippo, K. (2019). Visualizing music psychology: A bibliometric analysis of Psychology of Music, Music Perception, and Musicae Scientiae from 1973 to 2017. Music and Science, 2. https://doi.org/2059204318811786
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11, 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586-598. https://doi.org/10.1037/ 0022-3514.41.3.586
Banicki, K. (2014). Positive psychology on character strengths and virtues: A disquieting suggestion. New Ideas in Psychology, 33, 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.12.001
Boyack, K., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 2389-2404. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21419
Chiu, W., Fan, T., Nam, S., & Sun, P. (2021). Knowledge mapping and sustainable development of esports research: A bibliometric and visualized analysis. Sustainability, 13(18), 10354. https://doi.org/10.3390 /su131810354
Cobo, M., Lopez-Herrera, A., Merrera-Viedman, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 1382-1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
Courneya, K. S., & Bobick, T. M. (2000). Integrating the theory of planned behavior with the processes and stages of change in the exercise domain. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 1, 41-56. https://www .doi.org/10.1016/S1469-0292(00)00006-6
Cugelman, B. (2013). Gamification: What it is and why it matters to digital health behavior change developers. JMIR Serious Games, 1, e3. https://doi.org/10.2196/games.3139
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
Deterding, S. (2012). Gamification: Designing for motivation. Interactions, 19(4), 14-17. https://doi.org/10.1145 /2212877.2212883
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011, December). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”. Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning future media environments (pp. 9-15). Tampere, Finland.
Dichev, C., Dicheva, D., Angelova, G., & Agre, G. (2014). From gamification to gameful design and gameful experience in learning. Cybernetics and Information Technologies, 14(4), 80-100. https://doi.org/10 .1515/cait-2014-0007
Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Educational Technology and Society, 18(3), 75-88.
Fadda, M., Galimberti, E., Fiordelli, M., Romanò, L., Zanetti, A., & Schulz, P. (2017). Effectiveness of a smartphone app to increase patients’ knowledge and empowerment in the MMR vaccination decision: A randomized controlled trial. Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics, 13, 2512-2521. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2017.1360456
Georgiou, K., Gouras, A., & Nikolaou, I. (2019). Gamification in employee selection: The development of a gamified assessment. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 27, 91-103. https://doi.org /10.1111/ijsa.12240
Gingras, Y. (2016). Bibliometrics and research evaluation: Uses and abuses. The MIT Press.
Hamari, J., & Eranti, V. (2011, September). Framework for designing and evaluating game achievements. Proceedings of DiGRA 2011 Conference. Hilversum, the Netherlands.
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014, January). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Science. IEEE Computer Society.
Hanus, M., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers and Education, 80, 152-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.019
Hazan, B., Zhang, W., Olcum, E., Bergdoll, R., Grandoit, E., Mandelbaum, F., Wilson-Doenges, G., & Rabin, L. (2018). Gamification of an undergraduate psychology statistics lab: Benefits to perceived competence. Statistics Education Research Journal, 17, 255-265. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj .v17i2.169
Hernández-Torrano, D., & Ibrayeva, L. (2020). Creativity and education: A bibliometric mapping of the research literature (1975-2019). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019 .100625
Herzig, P., Ameling, M., & Schill, A. (2015). Workplace psychology and gamification: Theory and application. In T. Reiners & L. Wood (Eds.), Gamification in education and business (pp. 451-471). Springer.
Kato, P. M. (2010). Video games in health care: Closing the gap. Review of General Psychology, 14(2), 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019441
Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2014). Demographic differences in perceived benefits from gamification. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.007
Landers, R. N. (2014). Developing a theory of gamified learning: Linking serious games and gamification of learning. Simulation and Gaming, 45, 752-768. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878114563660
Landers, R. N., & Landers, A. K. (2014). An empirical test of the theory of gamified learning: The effect of leaderboards on time-on-task and academic performance. Simulation and Gaming, 45, 769-785. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878114563662
Landers, R. N., Bauer, K. N., & Callan, R. C. (2017). Gamification of task performance with leaderboards: A goal setting experiment. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 508-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015 .08.008
Lee, B. C. (2019). The effect of gamification on psychological and behavioral outcomes: Implications for cruise tourism destinations. Sustainability, 11(11), 3002. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113002
Liu, D., Santhanam, R., & Webster, J. (2017). Toward meaningful engagement: A framework for design and research of gamified information systems. MIS Quarterly, 41, 1011-1034.
López-Belmonte, J., Parra-González, M., Segura-Robles, A., & Pozo-Sánchez, S. (2020). Scientific mapping of gamification in Web of Science. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 10(3), 832-847. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe10030060
López-Belmonte, J., Segura-Robles, A., Fuentes-Cabrera, A., & Parra-González, M. (2020). Evaluating activation and absence of negative effect: Gamification and escape rooms for learning. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2224. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph170772224
Luthans, F., & Youssef-Morgan, C. (2017). Psychological capital: An evidence-based positive approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 339-366.
Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 4, 333-369. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113324
McDaniel, R., & Fanfarelli, J. (2016). Building better digital badges: Pairing completion logic with psychological factors. Simulation and Gaming, 47(1), 73-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878115627138
Morschheuser, B., Hassan, L., Werder, K., & Hamari, J. (2018). How to design gamification? A method for engineering gamified software. Information and Software Technology, 95, 219-237. https://doi.org /10.1016/j.infsof.2017.10.015
Pham, Q., Khatib, Y., Stansfeld, S., Fox, S., & Green, T. (2016). Feasibility and efficacy of an mHealth game for managing anxiety: “Flowy” randomized controlled pilot trial and design evaluation. Games for Health Journal, 5(1), 50-67. https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2015.0033
Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Kinzer, C. K. (2015). Foundations of game-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 50, 258-283.
Pogrebtsova, E., Tondello, G., Premsukh, H., & Nacke, L. (2017, October). Using technology to boost employee wellbeing? How gamification can help or hinder results. Positive Gaming: Workshop on Gamification and Games for Wellbeing. Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Rahim, M. I., & Thomas, R. H. (2017). Gamification and medication adherence in epilepsy. Seizure, 52, 11-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2017.09.008
Ruiz-Alba, J., Soares, A., Rodríguez-Molina, M., & Banoun, A. (2019). Gamification and entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 26(1), 661-683. https://doi.org/10 .1108/JSBED-09-2018-0266
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003- 066x.55.1.68
Ryan, R., Rigby, C., & Przybylski, A. (2006). The motivation pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and Emotion, 30(4), 344-360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9051-8
Sailer, M., Hense, J., Mayr, S., & Mandl, H. (2017). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 371-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.033
Seaborn, K., & Fels, D. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human- Computer Studies, 74, 14-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006
Skouw, S., Suldrup, A., & Olsen, A. (2020). A serious game approach to improve food behavior in families – A pilot study. Nutrients, 12, 1415. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12051415
Standage, M., & Ryan, R. (2020). Self-determination theory in sport and exercise. In G. Tenenbaum & R. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (pp. 37-56). Wiley.
Stansbury, J. A., & Earnest, D. R. (2017). Meaningful gamification in an industrial/organizational psychology course. Teaching of Psychology, 44(1), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628316677645
Sun, J., & Hsieh, P. (2018). Application of a gamified interactive response system to enhance the intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, student engagement, and attention of English learners. Educational Technology and Society, 21(3), 104-116.
Szabo, V. (2018). Psychasthenia Studio and the gamification of contemporary culture. Media and Communication, 6(2), 90-102. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i2.1351
Tantawi, M., Sadaf, S., & AlHumaid, J. (2018). Using gamification to develop academic writing skills in dental undergraduate students. European Journal of Dental Education, 22(1), 15-22. https://doi.org /10.1111/eje .12238
van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
van Genugten, Dusseldorp, E., Webb, T., & van Empelen, P. (2016). Which combinations of techniques and modes of delivery in internet-based interventions effectively change health behavior: A metaanalysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18, e155. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4218
Vassileva, J. (2012). Motivating participation in social computing applications: A user modeling perspective. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 22, 177-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-011-9109-5
Wee, S., & Choong, W. (2019). Gamification: Predicting the effectiveness of variety game design elements to intrinsically motivate users’ energy conservation behaviour. Journal of Environmental Management, 233, 97-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.127
Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629